News Corp in 2005: Consolidating the DirecTV Acquisition

            




<<Previous Page

The DirecTV Deal Contd...

A DirecTV employee commented ,

â?#8218;??#8220;People have been fooling around with interactive TV for four to five years. Finally, this marriage of interactive TV and the NFL may be the thing that breaks the dam wide open."

The company sent two-minute clips of every NFL game every Sunday evening to subscribers who had DVRs.

DirecTV was also meeting real-time statistics requests during football games. Viewers could also receive information from DirecTV about a particular team or a particular player. DirecTV was also revamping its movie programs based on the popular video-on-demand programs of cable companies. While DirecTV could not beam video-on-demand due to technical reasons, it was compiling requests from subscribers and getting ready to start video-on-demand.

Business Strategy Case Studies | Case Study in Management, Operations, Strategies, Business Strategy, Case Studies

or
Business Strategy Case Studies | Case Study in Management, Operations, Strategies, Business Strategy, Case Studies

or
PayPal (7 USD)

In 2004, News Corp launched various aggressive promotion campaigns. In an effort to increase its reach, DirecTV dropped the price of its DVR. It also launched a promotion that would give new customers a DirecTV set-top box for free. According to analysts, DirecTV spent about $670 to acquire and keep a new subscriber in 2002, while it spent about $758 in 2003 and $894 in 2004. Operating profits fell from about $459 million in 2003 to about $54 million in 2004. Meanwhile, the churn rate (The rate at which customers leave each month) was increasing. Compared to the monthly average of 1.5% in 2003, the rate climbed to 1.7% in 2004.

Murdoch and Carey remained upbeat about DirecTV even as competition from cable companies increased. Carey commented ,

â?#8218;??#8220;We' ve been helped by the fact that we are very focused on the television experience. The cable companies are fighting the broadband battle and are much more commoditized than television" .

But News Corp' s position had been weakened by some compromises made while closing the DirecTV deal. The FCC had already banned large cable operators from discriminating against rival programmers. So News Corp could not use to its advantage the muscle power of DirecTV. News Corp also had to submit to arbitration, if cable operators accused it of using its most popular channels as bargaining tools. But these restrictions were temporary as they expired in six years. By then News Corp would have about six million more subscribers according to company projections. There was also nothing in law that could stop DirecTV from collaborating with Fox Sports, another News Corp subsidiary, for content.

Next Page>>

Advertisement...

top